From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 17, 2013
Case No. 2:08-CV-00659-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-CV-00659-KJD-GWF

04-17-2013

MITCHELL FIELDS, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE BANNISTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff Mitchell Fields' Motion for Judgment (#97) and Motion for Submissions (#98).

On January 25, 2013, the Court issued an Order (#95) dismissing Plaintiff's claims for failure to state a claim and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff seeks entry judgment on a separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 58(a) for purposes of his appeal.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment (#97) and Motion for Submissions (#98) are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter a separate document setting out judgment without prejudice in favor of Defendants.

______________________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fields v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 17, 2013
Case No. 2:08-CV-00659-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Fields v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL FIELDS, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE BANNISTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:08-CV-00659-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 17, 2013)