From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fido v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 1, 2024
2:24-cv-00672-SSC (C.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00672-SSC

04-01-2024

KEANU KARL FIDO, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,[1]Defendant.

E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney DAVID M. HARRIS Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division CEDINA M. KIM Assistant United States Attorney Senior Trial Attorney, Civil Division JENNIFER LEE TARN, CSBN 240609 Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant


E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney DAVID M. HARRIS Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division CEDINA M. KIM Assistant United States Attorney Senior Trial Attorney, Civil Division JENNIFER LEE TARN, CSBN 240609 Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

HONORABLE STEPHANIE S. CHRISTENSEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having approved the parties' stipulation to remand this case pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with that stipulation and for entry of judgment for Plaintiff, judgment is hereby entered for Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Fido v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 1, 2024
2:24-cv-00672-SSC (C.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Fido v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:KEANU KARL FIDO, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 1, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00672-SSC (C.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2024)