From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Techs.

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Sep 26, 2022
C. A. 2017-0637-SG (Del. Ch. Sep. 26, 2022)

Opinion

C. A. 2017-0637-SG

09-26-2022

Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.,

Sean J. Bellew, Esquire Sean A. Meluney, Esquire William M. Alleman, Jr., Esquire Stephen A. Spence, Esquire


Sean J. Bellew, Esquire

Sean A. Meluney, Esquire William M. Alleman, Jr., Esquire Stephen A. Spence, Esquire

SAM GLASSCOCK III VICE CHANCELLOR

This letter memorializes the oral rulings made on Defendants' Motion in Limine during the pre-trial conference this afternoon. Regarding Mr. David Strober and Mr. John Burns, the Motion is denied without prejudice to Defendants' right to object to the relevance of those witnesses' testimony at trial. If Mr. Reff Sykes is to testify, he must do so in person and will be limited to rebuttal testimony. In addition, should Plaintiffs intend to call Mr. Sykes, Defendants must be given the opportunity to depose him before trial.

To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Techs.

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Sep 26, 2022
C. A. 2017-0637-SG (Del. Ch. Sep. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Techs.

Case Details

Full title:Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.,

Court:Court of Chancery of Delaware

Date published: Sep 26, 2022

Citations

C. A. 2017-0637-SG (Del. Ch. Sep. 26, 2022)

Citing Cases

Sykes v. Touchstream Techs.

See Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Techs. Inc., 2019 WL 193921 (Del. Ch. Jan. 15, 2019);…