From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Festa v. Ndoc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 29, 2017
2:17-cv-00850-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2017)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00850-APG-NJK

03-29-2017

ANTHONY FESTA, Plaintiff, v. NDOC, Defendant.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On March 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a temporary restraining order ("TRO") form to file against High Desert State Prison ("HDSP"). (ECF No. 5 at 1). Plaintiff requests a federal injunction form because the HDSP law library does not carry those forms. (Id.)

The Court denies the motion because a template to file a TRO or preliminary injunction does not exist. If Plaintiff seeks an order for a TRO or preliminary injunction, he should file a motion entitled "motion for temporary restraining order" or "motion for preliminary injunction" and set forth his arguments as to why he seeks such an order.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion requesting a TRO form (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.

DATED: This 29th day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Festa v. Ndoc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 29, 2017
2:17-cv-00850-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Festa v. Ndoc

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FESTA, Plaintiff, v. NDOC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

2:17-cv-00850-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2017)