From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order granting defendant's motion for a bill of particulars modified by disallowing items V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs are not required to disclose evidentiary facts under the guise of a bill of particulars. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE FERRO, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, JERRY FERRO, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Palazzo v. Abbate

A bill of particulars is not intended to be of aid to a party in obtaining evidentiary material. Its purpose…

Matter of Herle

It follows, therefore, that knowledge of the actual facts is not necessarily a bar to the relief ( Dunn v.…