From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferreira v. Porter

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 16, 2021
21 Civ. 6012 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6012 (AT)

07-16-2021

JUSTINE FERREIRA, as Parent and Natural Guardian of N.R. and individually, Plaintiffs, v. MEISHA PORTER, in her official capacity as the Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, and the NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding, ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear' and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ferreira v. Porter

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 16, 2021
21 Civ. 6012 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Ferreira v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:JUSTINE FERREIRA, as Parent and Natural Guardian of N.R. and individually…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 6012 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2021)