From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferran v. United States

United States District Court, D.Puerto Rico
Mar 31, 1955
17 F.R.D. 210 (D.P.R. 1955)

Opinion

         Action against United States. The United States moved for summary judgment. The District Court, Ruiz-Nazario, J., held that where amended complaint in action against United States was so meager in exposition of facts, which, if properly alleged, would have permitted court to determine whether action fell within exception of Federal Tort Claims Act, court could not, in absence of further facts, grant government's motion for summary judgment, which was grounded on exception to Act.

         Motion denied.

          Charles Henry Julia, San Juan, P. R., for plaintiff.

          Ruben Rodriguez Antongiorgi, U.S. Atty., San Juan, P. R., for defendant.


          RUIZ-NAZARIO, District Judge.

          The affidavit of the United States Attorney in support of the motion herein fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and, therefore, the Court cannot give any weight to the contents thereof in considering defendant's request for a summary judgment.

          As the allegations of the amended complaint are so meagre in the exposition of many informative facts which, if properly alleged, would have permitted the court to determine whether or not this action falls within the exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq., invoked by the defendant in its motion for summary judgment, the Court is unable to hold, in the absence of further facts presenting a clearer picture of the situation that defendant is entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law.

          ‘ A litigant has a right to a trial where there is the slightest doubt as to the facts.’ Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 130, 135, 136; Arenas v. United States, 322 U.S. 419, 434, 64 S.Ct. 1090 88 L.Ed. 1363; Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 464, 470, 471; Sarnoff v. Ciaglia, 3 Cir., 165 F.2d 167, 168. Cited with approval in Peckham v. Ronrico Corporation, 1 Cir., 171 F.2d 653, 657.

         That being the rule in this jurisdiction, defendant's motion for summary judgment must be, as it is hereby, denied.

         It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ferran v. United States

United States District Court, D.Puerto Rico
Mar 31, 1955
17 F.R.D. 210 (D.P.R. 1955)
Case details for

Ferran v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Trinidad FERRAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, D.Puerto Rico

Date published: Mar 31, 1955

Citations

17 F.R.D. 210 (D.P.R. 1955)