From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. May

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 18, 2023
2:23-cv-1540 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1540

09-18-2023

JARED T. FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD MAY, Defendant.


CHELSEY M. VASCURA, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner, sought a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is currently before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice. (ECF No. 12.) In that Motion, Petitioner indicates that unforeseen circumstances prevent him from timely litigation this action. Petitioner asks for dismissal without prejudice to allow him to “refile the case before the statute of limitations expires.” Id. at 1.

The Court GRANTS Portioner's Motion. (ECF No. 12.) The Court makes no determination whether the statute of limitations may bar a later refiling. The Clerk is DIRECTED to DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE this case and REMOVE it from the Court's active docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. May

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 18, 2023
2:23-cv-1540 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Ferguson v. May

Case Details

Full title:JARED T. FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD MAY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1540 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2023)