From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenton v. Colson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 2, 2012
No. 3:09-1057 (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-1057

05-02-2012

JAMES E. FENTON, JR. Petitioner, v. ROLAND COLSON, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGE HAYNES


RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURT'S GRANTING AN

EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

Comes the respondent, Roland Colson, Warden, by counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 7(b) and Local Rule 7.01 and respectfully requests this Honorable Court reconsider its Order granting the petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing and issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum entered on April 30, 2012. In support, the respondent states as follows:

1. On April 30, 2012, the Court entered an Order granting the petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing and issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum stating the motion was unopposed. (Doc. Entry No. 26).

2. Indeed, the respondent previously opposed the petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing in the parties Joint Statement setting forth the reasons and


Summaries of

Fenton v. Colson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 2, 2012
No. 3:09-1057 (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Fenton v. Colson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. FENTON, JR. Petitioner, v. ROLAND COLSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-1057 (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)