From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fentner v. Tempest Recovery Services, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 2, 2008
07-CV-561A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-561A.

September 2, 2008


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 12, 2008, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff's motion to dismiss the defendant's counterclaim be granted.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's motion to dismiss the defendant's counterclaim is granted.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fentner v. Tempest Recovery Services, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 2, 2008
07-CV-561A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Fentner v. Tempest Recovery Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES FENTNER, Plaintiff, v. TEMPEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2008

Citations

07-CV-561A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

Unangst v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.

This standard has eliminated much of the necessity of distinguishing between compulsory and permissive…

Krezic v. Advanced Endodontics of Buffalo, PC

Following the enactment of § 1367, “it is no longer necessary to distinguish between permissive and…