From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenner v. Florentine Forge, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 15, 1977
342 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. Y-68.

February 15, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Ernest E. Mason, J.

R.P. Warfield of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Graff, Mabie, Rosenbloum Magie, Pensacola, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Fenner appeals from an adverse final judgment which dismissed his amended complaint without leave to amend. The final judgment was entered on 11 February 1975 and dismissed the amended complaint on the ground that it was barred by the four year statute of limitations set forth in Section 672.725(1), Florida Statutes (1973). Fenner contends that the applicable statute of limitations is five years as set forth in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1973).

The trial court erred in two respects. Firstly, Section 672.725(1) was repealed by Chapter 74-382, Section 26, Laws of Florida, effective 1 January 1975. Lastly, the action brought by Fenner on a written warranty not under seal is governed by the statute of limitations set forth in Section 95.11(3).

We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

McCORD, Acting C.J., and SMITH, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fenner v. Florentine Forge, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 15, 1977
342 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Fenner v. Florentine Forge, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAY H. FENNER, APPELLANT (PLAINTIFF), v. FLORENTINE FORGE, INC., A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

342 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Dade County v. Rohr Industries, Inc.

Finally, on June 30, 1976, Gurgiolo filed suit against Kelley Tractor. Because the cause of action had…