From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenn v. Dayan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 30, 2012
Case No. 6:12-cv-10-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:12-cv-10-Orl-31KRS

01-30-2012

ROBERT FENN and ANDRITA KING-FENN, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH N. DAYAN; SHAPIRO AND FISHMAN, LP; and BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 2) filed January 4, 2012.

On January 9, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 6) recommending that the motion be denied. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The complaint in this case is DISMISSED without prejudice and the Application to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 7) and an Amended Application to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 10) which will be considered.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on this 30th day of January, 2012. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party

_________________

GREGORY A. PRESNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fenn v. Dayan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 30, 2012
Case No. 6:12-cv-10-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Fenn v. Dayan

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT FENN and ANDRITA KING-FENN, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH N. DAYAN; SHAPIRO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:12-cv-10-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2012)