From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenix v. City of Long Beach

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 16, 2024
2:24-cv-03639-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-03639-FMO-E

07-16-2024

CHRISTOL FENIX Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al. Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Fenix v. City of Long Beach

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 16, 2024
2:24-cv-03639-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Fenix v. City of Long Beach

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOL FENIX Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-03639-FMO-E (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2024)