From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felthousen v. N.Y. Cen. and Hudson R. RR Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

October, 1916.


Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Held, that the terms of the lease were sufficiently comprehensive to relieve the defendant from liability for damages arising from the negligent operation of its train as found by the jury. All concurred.


Summaries of

Felthousen v. N.Y. Cen. and Hudson R. RR Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Felthousen v. N.Y. Cen. and Hudson R. RR Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD G. FELTHOUSEN, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)