From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1952
202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)

Opinion

June 19, 1952.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of the Bronx, LORETO, J.

Louis Drell for appellant.

Leatrice Fellner, respondent in person.


The defendant's employment having been terminated without fault on his part, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of any part of the fee paid for the conduct of the action to its conclusion, depends on the intention of the parties when the payment was made, to be determined from the receipt and all the surrounding circumstances. These issues should be explored fully.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

HOFSTADTER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum; HECHT, J., dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1952
202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)
Case details for

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Case Details

Full title:LEATRICE FELLNER, Respondent, v. WILLIAM ZUCKERBERG, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1952

Citations

202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)
118 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

Petition of Roseman Colin Freund Lewis Cohen

We express no opinion as to the reasonableness of the agreement, but merely note that a full exploration of…