From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 2014
3 N.E.3d 1215 (Ohio 2014)

Opinion

NO. 2013-1746

2014-02-19

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.



APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW


Cuyahoga App. No. 98985, 2013-Ohio-3523. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.
O'Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI.

Kennedy and O'Neill, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III through VI.

O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Upon consideration of the motion of appellants to strike portions of the memorandum in response, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the memorandum in response is stricken. Appellees shall file a memorandum in response that is compliant with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and the Rules of Professional Conduct within three days of the date of this entry.


Summaries of

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 2014
3 N.E.3d 1215 (Ohio 2014)
Case details for

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 19, 2014

Citations

3 N.E.3d 1215 (Ohio 2014)
138 Ohio St. 3d 1413