From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldman v. Pokertek, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 26, 2013
2:09-cv-01598-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

2:09-cv-01598-JCM-VCF

03-26-2013

MARVIN ROY FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. POKERTEK, INC., Defendant.


ORDER


[Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (#83)]

Presently before the court is Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (#83). Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Pokertek, Inc.'s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (#84), and Defendant filed its Reply in Support of Pokertek's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (#85). On March 26, 2013, Plaintiff filed the Notice of Withdrawal of Opposition and Consent to Enforce Settlement (#87).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (#83) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal must be filed on or before noon, Friday, March 29, 2013.

_______________

CAM FERENBACH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Feldman v. Pokertek, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 26, 2013
2:09-cv-01598-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Feldman v. Pokertek, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN ROY FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. POKERTEK, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

2:09-cv-01598-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2013)