From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldman v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
3:11-cv-00813-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00813-LRH-VPC

01-28-2013

BENJAMIN J. FELDMAN, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but initially failed to pay the filing fee or apply to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) The Court then denied the application which was submitted by petitioner. (ECF Nos. 7 and 8). Petitioner was directed to pay the fee, which he has not done. Petitioner has not been in contact with the Court since he was directed to pay the fee on December 27, 2011, to seek additional time or to ask for any other relief. Therefore, the Court concludes that petitioner has abandoned the action. The petition shall be dismissed and the matter closed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition in this matter (ECF No. 1) shall be FILED and is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

___________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Feldman v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
3:11-cv-00813-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Feldman v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN J. FELDMAN, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00813-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)