From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felder v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 4, 2015
No. 05-14-01031-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-14-01031-CR No. 05-14-01032-CR No. 05-14-01033-CR

11-04-2015

DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-52047-L, F14-52048-L, F14-52049-L

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Whitehill

Daniel DeAnthony Felder, Jr. waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three offenses of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment in each case.

On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgments. Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
141031F.P05

/Bill Whitehill/

BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52047-L).
Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52048-L).
Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52049-L).
Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Felder v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 4, 2015
No. 05-14-01031-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Felder v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

No. 05-14-01031-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2015)