From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinswog v. Holland Am. Line Westours

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 17, 1994
636 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1351.

April 5, 1994. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert P. Kaye, J.

Cohen, Berke, Bernstein, Brodie, Kondell Laszlo and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Miami, for appellants.

Rumberger, Kirk Caldwell and F. Laurens Brock and Jose L. Fernandez, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of disputed issues of material fact regarding the question of liability of the appellee, it was error for the trial court to grant the summary judgment.

As the operator of a walking tour of a state park, and as the provider of a tour guide for said tour, the appellee owed the appellant, a member of the tour group, a duty to operate the tour in a reasonably safe manner. See Stevenson v. Four Winds Travel, Inc., 462 F.2d 899 (5th Cir. 1972); Kaufman v. A-1 Bus Lines, Inc., 416 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The appellee's actions in this case presented a jury question, which could not be properly resolved on summary judgment, regarding the appellee's possible negligence. See McCain v. Florida Power Corp., 593 So.2d 500, 504 (Fla. 1992). Consequently, the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee is reversed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Feinswog v. Holland Am. Line Westours

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 17, 1994
636 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Feinswog v. Holland Am. Line Westours

Case Details

Full title:MALVINA FEINSWOG AND BENJAMIN FEINSWOG, APPELLANTS, v. HOLLAND AMERICA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 17, 1994

Citations

636 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)