From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feingold Electric v. Highbar Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Submitted July 9, 1964

Decided July 10, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE TILZER, J.

Emanuel M. Cohn and D. George Paston for motions.

Samuel Kirschenbaum opposed.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. If the motion were properly before it, the Court of Appeals would deny on the merits.

Motion for stay denied.


Summaries of

Feingold Electric v. Highbar Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Feingold Electric v. Highbar Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FEINGOLD ELECTRIC, INC., Appellant, v. HIGHBAR CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1964

Citations

200 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1964)
200 N.E.2d 870
252 N.Y.S.2d 331