Opinion
15592.
NOVEMBER 13, 1946.
Construction of will. Before Judge Porter. Walker Superior Court. June 7, 1946.
McClure McClure, for plaintiffs in error.
Gleason Painter, Shaw Shaw, and Andrew W. Cain Jr., contra.
The trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.
No. 15592. NOVEMBER 13, 1946.
Joseph and Michael Fehn filed their petition against George Paul Shaw, as administrator with the will annexed of Martin Fehn, and Magdalena Fehn, alleging: that the plaintiffs are the only children and heirs at law of Martin Fehn, who died testate in Walker County, Georgia, on May 1, 1941; that the defendant, Magdalena Fehn, is a legatee and devisee under the will of Martin Fehn, and "is a citizen and resident of Walker County, Georgia;" that the will of Martin Fehn (which was attached to the petition as an exhibit) provides in part as follows: "I will, bequeath and devise all my real property of every kind and wherever situated, to my wife, Magdalena Fehn, to be hers absolutely and in fee simple," with a somewhat similar bequest of personal property; that the defendant, Magdalena Fehn, "was at the time of the death of Martin Fehn . . a citizen of the German Reich and still is a German citizen and is an alien enemy," and under the laws of Georgia is incapable of taking property; that so much of the will as devises property to Magdalena Fehn is null and void; that the administrator is proposing to assent to these bequests and devises and threatening to deliver to Magdalena Fehn all real and personal property bequeathed and devised to her. The prayers of the petition were for a construction of the will; that the provisions of the will giving real and personal property to Magdalena Fehn be declared null and void; and for general relief.
The defendants demurred to the petition generally upon the ground that it set forth no cause of action. This demurrer was sustained, and to this judgment the plaintiffs excepted.
The petition in this case contains the allegation that "Magdalena Fehn . . is a citizen and resident of Walker County, Georgia." In another paragraph it is alleged: "Magdalena Fehn was at the time of the death of Martin Fehn . . a citizen of the German Reich and still is a German citizen and is an alien enemy." Construing the contradictory allegations of the petition most strongly against the pleader, as we must do, the petition shows that Magdalena Fehn, at the time of the filing of the petition, was a citizen of Walker County, Georgia, and hence a citizen of the United States.
The will in question appears to have been executed on March 20, 1939. The death of the testator is alleged to have occurred on May 1, 1941. The petition, therefore, makes the allegation that on May 1, 1941, and for some period of time thereafter, the length of time not being disclosed, the beneficiary under the will, Magdalena Fehn, was a German citizen; that we were at war with Germany, and since she thus became an alien enemy, she can not take under the devises contained in the will.
The first question presented is, when did we become involved in war with Germany? "The courts are bound by a declaration or determination by the proper department of government that a war exists, while until there has been such a declaration or determination the courts can not take judicial notice of the existence of a war by their government." 67 C. J. 336. The resolution of Congress declaring war on Germany was signed by the President on December 11, 1941. It follows that when the will in question was executed, and when the testator died, the beneficiary under the will was not an alien enemy, for the reason that this country was not on either of these dates at war with Germany.
At the time the petition alleges that the administrator "is threatening to assent to said bequests and devises and to deliver to the defendant Magdalena Fehn any and all real property belonging to the estate of Martin Fehn," the legatee is not shown to be an alien enemy, for the reason that the petition discloses her to be a citizen of this country. We are called upon to determine whether or not a petition, disclosing these facts, sets forth a good cause of action.
Our Code provides: "Aliens, the subjects of governments at peace with the United States and this State, as long as their governments remain at peace, shall be entitled to all the rights of citizens of other States resident in this State, and shall have the privilege of purchasing, holding and conveying real estate in this State." § 79-303. "By the common law, an alien may take by purchase, by grant, or by devise, but not by descent." 2 Am. Jur., Aliens, 476, § 28. By the great weight of authority the general rule in practically all jurisdictions seems to be correctly stated in 137 A.L.R. 1328, as follows: "The general rule appears to be that an alien enemy may take land by devise and hold it subject to the will of the government in which the land is situated; in other words, that the devise is not void except as against the government, whose will must be manifested by appropriate action."
This court, in Hargroves v. Redd, 43 Ga. 142, said: "A legacy in a will, to legatees capable of taking it at the time the will is made and also at the time of the death of the testator, is not void because there was a period intermediate between the making of the will and the death of the testator when the legatees were incapable of taking such legacy and the same was illegal and void."
It follows from what has been said above that there was no error in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.