From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fehling v. Fehling

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Nov 4, 2016
202 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–4391.

11-04-2016

Linda M. FEHLING, Appellant, v. David K. FEHLING Sr., Appellee.

Linda M. Fehling, pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.


Linda M. Fehling, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that appellant's notice of appeal failed to invoke its appellate jurisdiction in a timely manner. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed with the appropriate court within 30 days of rendition of the order on appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). Merely mailing the notice or having the notice placed in a post office box within the required time period is not sufficient. Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Further, the filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Florida courts are required to dismiss an appeal if the notice is not filed within the applicable time limit. See Miami–Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fehling v. Fehling

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Nov 4, 2016
202 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Fehling v. Fehling

Case Details

Full title:LINDA M. FEHLING, Appellant, v. DAVID K. FEHLING SR., Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Nov 4, 2016

Citations

202 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)