Fed'n. of Ore. Parole Probation Officers v. State

Full title: FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Respondent, v. STATE…

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 25, 1992

841 P.2d 704 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

841 P.2d 704

Opinion

UP-117-89; CA A69143

Submitted on petitioner's motion for reconsideration filed October 14, 1992

Reconsideration allowed; opinion ( 114 Or. App. 214, 834 P.2d 519) vacated; remanded to Employment Relations Board for reconsideration November 25, 1992

Judicial Review from Employment Relations Board.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion vacated; remanded to Employment Relations Board for reconsideration in the light of Tualatin Valley Bargaining v. Tigard School Dist., 314 Or. 274, 840 P.2d 657 (1992).