From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Insurance Company v. Kimbrough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1986
116 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 27, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs payable by respondent Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Company, petitioner's application granted, and arbitration permanently stayed.

It is incumbent upon an insurer which has disclaimed insurance coverage to come forward with proof that it had validly canceled the policy prior to the date of the accident (see, Matter of American Sec. Ins. Co. [Novoa], 97 A.D.2d 541, 542). The insurer can satisfy that burden by presenting evidence of an office practice geared to insure the likelihood that a notice of cancellation is always properly addressed and mailed (see, Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray, 46 N.Y.2d 828, 830; Anzalone v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 92 A.D.2d 238). In the instant case, the sole witness to testify at the hearing was an underwriter employed by the respondent insurer who had no personal knowledge of or participation in its mailing procedures. Under the circumstances, there is insufficient proof on the record to support a conclusion that the policy issued by respondent insurer on behalf of Cebage Taxi, the owner of the vehicle involved in the collision, had been properly canceled prior to the date of the accident. Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Federal Insurance Company v. Kimbrough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1986
116 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Federal Insurance Company v. Kimbrough

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ALFONSO K. KIMBROUGH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Sea Insurance v. Kopsky

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs payable by the respondent Hanover Insurance…

Petition of Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. Alexis

Thus, it was New York Central's burden to establish, by competent evidence, that it properly canceled the…