Summary
In Feder, however, the First Department upheld the trial court's holding that plaintiffs could assert a private right of action under Section 18 in one sentence, without analysis, as it simply held that it was affirming "for the reasons stated by [the trial court]."
Summary of this case from Ortiz v. Ciox Health LLCOpinion
June 22, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered December 8, 1999, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Cohen, J., without costs or disbursements. Motion seeking leave to file as amicus curiae denied.
Herbert Rubin, for plaintiffs-respondents-appellants.
Leonard M. Rosenberg, Nancy Ledy-Gurren Elissa L. Shechter, David A. Zarett, Samuel D. Levy, for defendants-appellants-respondents.
Before: Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.
No opinion. Order filed.