Opinion
No. CIV S-12-2649 KJM DAD
04-16-2013
ORDER
On January 29, 2013, this court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, remanded the action to the Solano County Superior Court, and closed the case. On February 28, 2013 plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. However, "[o]nce a district court certifies a remand order to state court it is divested of jurisdiction and can take no further action on the case." Seedman v. United States Dist. Court, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir. 1998).
The docket contains two motions, but they are the same. ECF Nos. 16 & 17.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, ECF Nos. 16 and 17, is denied.
___________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE