Opinion
Case No. CIV.2:11-2628-WBS-CKD
02-26-2013
TRIEBSCH & FRAMPTON Cory B. Chartrand Michael G. Dini Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiffs KAREN BHATTI and PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES WEYAND LAW FIRM, A Professional Corporation Alexander M. Weyand Rebecca M. Hoberg Attorneys for Defendant SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD aka SOPHIE NEJAD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING
COUNTERCLAIMS OF THIRD PARTY
DEFENDANT SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD
FOR INDEMNITY, CONTRIBUTION,
AND APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT
Honorable William B. Shubb
Trial: April 16, 2013
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs KAREN BHATTI and PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES ("Third Party Plaintiffs") and Third Party Defendant and Counter-Claimant SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD aka SOPHIE NEJAD ("Third Party Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") as follows:
Whereas, on or about January 14, 2013, Third Party Defendant SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD filed counterclaims for indemnity, contribution, and apportionment of fault against Third Party Plaintiffs (Dkt #82);
Whereas, on or about February 5, 2013, Third Party Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaims pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt #90);
Whereas, the parties have met and conferred regarding the motion;
Now, therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Third Party Defendant agrees to dismiss, without prejudice, the first and second counterclaims against Third Party Plaintiffs for Indemnity and Contribution. Such dismissal does not preclude Third Party Defendant from re-filing counterclaims for indemnity or contribution against Third Party Plaintiffs should any other party to this action, either formally or informally, later assert claims against or seek relief from Third Party Defendant, or in the event Third Party Defendant settles with any such other party or satisfies all or any part of any judgment thereto (any such claims presently non-existent but denied if later asserted).
2. The third counterclaim for apportionment will not be dismissed.
3. The remaining counterclaim for apportionment is deemed denied and answered, with all affirmative defenses alleged by Third Party Plaintiffs in response to the underlying complaint in this action deemed preserved with respect to the counterclaim.
4. Nothing hereby affects Third Party Defendant's rights at trial relative to its comparative fault and related affirmative defenses.
5. The Parties agree that Third Party Defendant will have 30 days from the date this Stipulation and Order is approved by the Court to file an amended counterclaim or cross-claim.
6. The Parties hereby respectfully request that the Court take the March 11, 2013 hearing on Third Party Plaintiffs' aforesaid Motion to Dismiss off calendar.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
TRIEBSCH & FRAMPTON
By: ___________________
Cory B. Chartrand
Michael G. Dini
Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiffs KAREN
BHATTI and PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba
CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES
(As Authorized on February 22, 2013)
WEYAND LAW FIRM, A Professional Corporation
By: ___________________
Alexander M. Weyand
Rebecca M. Hoberg
Attorneys for Defendant SOPHIE
REISIYANNEJAD aka SOPHIE NEJAD
(As Authorized on February 22, 2013)
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE