From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feather-Gorbey v. Adm'r Fed. Bureau of Prisons Grand Prairie

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Mar 30, 2021
No. 20-10749 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-10749

03-30-2021

CHIEF MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ADMINISTRATOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS UNITED STATES, Defendants—Appellees.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:17-CV-26 Before WILLETT, HO, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5.4. --------

Chief Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey, federal prisoner # 33405-013, moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motions challenging the dismissal without prejudice of his complaint as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Feather-Gorbey has failed to show that he should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under § 1915(g). See Baños v. O'Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998). Further, his argument that the district court violated his right of access to the courts lacks merit. See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 821 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, Feather-Gorbey's motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Further, because the facts surrounding the IFP decision are "inextricably intertwined" with the merits of the issues raised in Feather-Gorbey's Rule 60(b) motions, his appeal from the district court's denial of these motions is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). Feather-Gorbey's motions for judicial notice are DENIED. See FED. R. EVID. 201(b). And in any event, to the extent that he seeks to supplement the record in support of his IFP motion, the new evidence that he has provided fails to show that he is in imminent danger as a result of the denial of medical care.

The dismissal of this appeal counts as a strike under § 1915(g). See Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763 (2015). Feather-Gorbey is CAUTIONED that he has been barred previously and remains barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). He is further CAUTIONED that frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings will invite the imposition of additional sanctions, which may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court's jurisdiction. To avoid sanctions, Feather-Gorbey should review any pending appeals and actions he may have pending and move to dismiss any frivolous ones.


Summaries of

Feather-Gorbey v. Adm'r Fed. Bureau of Prisons Grand Prairie

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Mar 30, 2021
No. 20-10749 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Feather-Gorbey v. Adm'r Fed. Bureau of Prisons Grand Prairie

Case Details

Full title:CHIEF MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ADMINISTRATOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

No. 20-10749 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2021)

Citing Cases

Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Adm'r, F. Bop Designation Ctr.

Id. (citing Feather-Gorbey v. Administrator Fed. Bureau of Prisons Grand Prairie, 841 Fed.Appx. 724,…

Feather-Gorbey v. Adm'r, F.BOP Designation Ctr.

In addition, the court notes that this is not the first time a case by Plaintiff was found to be barred by…