Opinion
No. 35328
Decided December 18, 1957.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Ordinance prohibiting possession of "pin-game" machines — Declaratory judgment action — Injunction sought restraining enforcement — Amusement device usable for gambling — Police power — Powers of local self-government — Claimed impairment of obligation of contract — Claimed conflict with general law — Delegation of power — Evidence — Operation of machines — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution — Due process — Equal protection of the laws.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County.
Mr. Dan H. McCullough and Mr. John J. Schuchmann, for appellants.
Mr. Charles T. Lawton, director law, and Mr. William D. Driscoll, for appellees.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HERBERT, JJ., concur.