From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fayed v. Winslow

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 25, 2023
23-cv-01012-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-01012-JST

04-25-2023

JAMES MICHAEL FAYED, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WINSLOW, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE: ECF NO. 10

JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, an inmate housed at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has since filed a motion to withdraw this action without prejudice, which the Court construes as a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). ECF No. 10. Plaintiff also requests that the Court waive the filing fees. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) provides that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and that such dismissal is without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). Defendants have not yet filed an answer. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED. ECF No. 10. The Court cannot waive filing fees. The Court is required to assess filing fees whenever a civil action is initiated. 28 U.S.C § 1914. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants, and close the case.

This order terminates ECF No. 18.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fayed v. Winslow

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 25, 2023
23-cv-01012-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Fayed v. Winslow

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MICHAEL FAYED, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WINSLOW, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 25, 2023

Citations

23-cv-01012-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)