From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fayad v. McMahon

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 25, 2022
2:18-CV-13982-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-CV-13982-TGB-APP

01-25-2022

RAY AHMED FAYAD, Plaintiff, v. JAMES MCMAHON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

TERRENCE G. BERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court was notified that the parties had reached a resolution in this matter. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. See, e.g., Moore v. United States Postal Serv., 369 Fed. App'x 712 (6th Cir. 2010). Parties shall inform the Court as soon as they have obtained approval of the settlement agreement by the relevant municipal stakeholders. They may also submit a stipulated judgment for entry at that time. If for any reason municipal approval is withheld, the Court will allow Plaintiff to re-open the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fayad v. McMahon

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 25, 2022
2:18-CV-13982-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Fayad v. McMahon

Case Details

Full title:RAY AHMED FAYAD, Plaintiff, v. JAMES MCMAHON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

2:18-CV-13982-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2022)