From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faulkenberg v. State Farm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1993
623 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2990.

July 30, 1993. Rehearing Denied September 22, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County; William F. Edwards, Judge.

Kenneth S. Stepp, Inverness, for appellants.

Francis J. Carroll, Jr. and Allison Morris, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest Fischer, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellees.


This appeal arises from a final summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Upon a review of the record, we find two genuine issues of material fact that remain unresolved and preclude the entry of summary judgment:

1. Whether State Farm improperly cancelled the Faulkenbergs' insurance policy for nonpayment of premium; and

2. Whether State Farm is estopped from asserting that the Faulkenbergs' policy had been cancelled prior to the loss.
See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966); Boman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 505 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1987); Peninsular Life Ins. Co. v. Wade, 425 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faulkenberg v. State Farm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1993
623 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Faulkenberg v. State Farm

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. FAULKENBERG, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 22, 1993

Citations

623 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)