From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fatigate v. Lion Insurance Company of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1979
70 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

June 4, 1979


In an action, inter alia, to declare that the disclaimer interposed by the defendant insurance company is improper, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 1978, which granted the relief requested. Judgment affirmed, with costs. During the course of this nonjury trial the defendant offered no explanation for its delay of almost three months in disclaiming, after having unconditionally agreed to defend the action during the intervening period. Under these circumstances, an argument that the plaintiff was also delinquent in notifying it of the accident is of no avail (see Hartford Ins. Co. v. County of Nassau, 46 N.Y.2d 1028). Subdivision 8 of section 167 Ins. of the Insurance Law requires that a notification of disclaimer must be made "as soon as is reasonably possible". Defendant's additional argument that it had been prejudiced by settlement negotiations held between plaintiff's counsel and a third party's insurer is a bare assertion unsupported by evidence and must, therefore, be rejected. Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fatigate v. Lion Insurance Company of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1979
70 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Fatigate v. Lion Insurance Company of New York

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST C. FATIGATE, Respondent, v. LION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1979

Citations

70 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)