From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fasthorse v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2020
459 P.3d 226 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 80589

02-27-2020

Lavern Charles FASTHORSE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Lavern Fasthorse Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Lavern Fasthorse

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to enforce its order directing the State to file a response.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). In fact, petitioner failed to indicate the nature of the relief he seeks below. Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).

We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Petitioner’s failure to provide timely proof of service of the petition constitutes an additional basis upon which to deny relief. NRAP 21(a)(1).


Summaries of

Fasthorse v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2020
459 P.3d 226 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Fasthorse v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAVERN CHARLES FASTHORSE, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 27, 2020

Citations

459 P.3d 226 (Nev. 2020)