From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fasano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 20, 2011
373 P.3d 913 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57662.

05-20-2011

Timothy FASANO and Rebecca Fasano, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. WAL–MART STORES, INC., A Delaware Corporation; WCW Corporation, A Nevada Corporation; and Fallon Gaming Corporation, A Nevada Corporation, Respondents.

Rebecca Fasano Timothy Fasano Kent Law Kravitz, Schnitzer, Sloane, Johnson & Eberhardy, Chtd. Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno


Rebecca Fasano

Timothy Fasano

Kent Law

Kravitz, Schnitzer, Sloane, Johnson & Eberhardy, Chtd.

Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying appellants' motion to disqualify a district court judge. Third Judicial District Court, Churchill County; David A. Huff, Judge.

No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from an order denying disqualification of a judge, and thus the challenged order is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984) (stating that an appeal may be taken only when authorized by rule or statute). Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

We deny all pending motions as moot in light of this order.


Summaries of

Fasano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 20, 2011
373 P.3d 913 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Fasano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Timothy FASANO and Rebecca Fasano, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: May 20, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 913 (Nev. 2011)