From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell v. Vigmar Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

January, 1935.


In an action for malicious abuse of process, order in so far as it denies motion to dismiss the second cause of action and fails or refuses to provide that all the matters set out in the complaint are res judicata affirmed, without costs, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Farrell v. Vigmar Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Farrell v. Vigmar Realty Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HELEN RYAN FARRELL, Also Known as HELEN RYAN, Respondent, v. VIGMAR REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)