From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrar v. Receivable Management Service

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Feb 5, 2010
Case No. 09-cv-149-JPG (S.D. Ill. Feb. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 09-cv-149-JPG.

February 5, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jana Farrar's ("Farrar") Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 44).

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g), Defendant Receivable Management Service's ("Receivable") response was due fourteen days after Farrar's motion was filed, but fourteen days have passed and Receivable has yet to respond. The Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. S. D. Ill. R. 7.1(g). As such, the Court hereby ORDERS Receivable to SHOW CAUSE on or before February 26, 2010, why the Court should not construe its failure to timely respond to the instant motion as an admission of its merits and proceed accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Farrar v. Receivable Management Service

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Feb 5, 2010
Case No. 09-cv-149-JPG (S.D. Ill. Feb. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Farrar v. Receivable Management Service

Case Details

Full title:JANA FARRAR, Plaintiff, v. RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT SERVICE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Feb 5, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-cv-149-JPG (S.D. Ill. Feb. 5, 2010)