From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farr v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
3:10-1223 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-1223

05-18-2012

CHARLOTTE FAYE FARR, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security


ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Griffin, Document #21, wherein she recommends the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record, Document #14, be granted to the extent that this case be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge to develop the record. The Defendant has filed an objection thereto, Document #22, and the Plaintiff has filed a response, Document #23.

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Griffin's Report and Recommendation, Document #21. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record, Document #14, is GRANTED to the extent that the case is remanded to the Administrative Law Judge to develop the record by referring the Plaintiff to an examining psychiatrist and/or to Dr. Chen to complete a psychological evaluation that aligns with the requirements of section B of Listing 12.04, such as a PRTF; by requesting that the examining psychiatrist and/or Dr. Chen identify specific factors that support their findings; and by requesting that Dr. Doineau provide specific support for her determination that the Plaintiff's ability to sustain concentration and pace was markedly limited.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Farr v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
3:10-1223 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Farr v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE FAYE FARR, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

3:10-1223 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)