Farnsworth v. Graber

Full title: Richard Brent Farnsworth, Petitioner, v. Conrad Graber, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 3, 2011

No. CV 10-533-TUC-FRZ (GEE) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 10-533-TUC-FRZ (GEE).

June 3, 2011

ORDER

FRANK ZAPATA, District Judge

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Edmonds that recommends denying Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and denying Petitioner's motion to amend the petition. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Edmonds' recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Edmonds' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition is denied, the motion to amend the petition is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter.