From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Davidson Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
No. 3:12-0434 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0434

05-10-2012

KEITH LAMONT FARMER Plaintiff, v. DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al. Defendants.


Judge Sharp


MEMORANDUM

The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is an inmate at the Davidson County Criminal Justice Center in Nashville. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Davidson County Sheriff's Office; Daron Hall, Sheriff of Davidson County; ABL Management Food Services; the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County; and five members of the Davidson County Sheriff's Office; seeking damages.

In December, 2011, the plaintiff began to eat his lunch when he realized that he had bitten into something sharp. The sharp object left deep cuts in the plaintiff's mouth and caused him a great deal of bleeding. The plaintiff believes that the defendants should compensate him for his injuries.

To establish a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the defendants, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of a right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 101 S.Ct. 1908 (1981).

In essence, the plaintiff claims that his injuries were a result of the defendants' negligence. Negligent conduct, however, is not actionable under § 1983 because it does not rise to the level of a constitutional deprivation. Estelle v. Gamble, 97S.Ct. 285 (1976). This is true with respect to negligence claims arising under both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Whitley v. Albers, 106 S.Ct. 1078, 1084 (1986)(Eighth Amendment); Daniels v. Williams, 106 S.Ct. 662, 666 (1986)(Fourteenth Amendment). Thus, the plaintiff has failed to allege conduct that violates the Constitution.

In the absence of a constitutional violation, the plaintiff is unable to prove every element of his cause of action. Therefore, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted. Under such circumstances, the Court is obliged to dismiss the instant action sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

An appropriate order will be entered.

____________

Kevin H. Sharp

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Farmer v. Davidson Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
No. 3:12-0434 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Farmer v. Davidson Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:KEITH LAMONT FARMER Plaintiff, v. DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0434 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)