From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Bagla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 16, 2018
No. 3:18-cv-00504-PK (D. Or. Sep. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-00504-PK

09-16-2018

LYNNDA FARMER, Plaintiff, v. DR. AMAN BAGLA, DR. HEATHER FOX, and MEGAN CONLEE, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (#29) on August 3, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant the moving Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [29]. Accordingly, Defendants Bagla's and Fox's motion to dismiss [21] is granted. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff's claims are brought against Defendant Conlee, they are also dismissed. For the reasons explained by Judge Papak, the claims are not subject to amendment and thus, are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16 day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Farmer v. Bagla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 16, 2018
No. 3:18-cv-00504-PK (D. Or. Sep. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Farmer v. Bagla

Case Details

Full title:LYNNDA FARMER, Plaintiff, v. DR. AMAN BAGLA, DR. HEATHER FOX, and MEGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 16, 2018

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-00504-PK (D. Or. Sep. 16, 2018)