From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farley v. Dehart

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Feb 10, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-345-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-345-PB.

February 10, 2011


ORDER


The plaintiff has failed to comply with my order to file an objection to the motion to dismiss. Therefore, even if he has not waived his right to object to the relief requested in the motion, an issue I do not decide, he has deprived me of information I need to evaluate the motion. Accepting as true the defendants' assertions with respect to standing — to the extent that they are not contradicted by averments in the complaint — I conclude that the plaintiff lacks standing for the reasons set forth in the defendants' objection and supporting memorandum. The motion to dismiss (doc. no 30) is granted and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

February 10, 2011


Summaries of

Farley v. Dehart

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Feb 10, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-345-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Farley v. Dehart

Case Details

Full title:Edward Farley v. James DeHart, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-345-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 10, 2011)