From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farias v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 13, 1970
423 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24683.

February 13, 1970.

Murry Liftig (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Joseph A. Milchen (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

The Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.


We have examined carefully the record before us and doubled the time for oral argument by appellant's counsel. Three principal errors are claimed. (1) Once there is proof that a document or copy thereof has been destroyed or lost for whatever reason, secondary evidence may properly be admitted in its place, within the judicial discretion of the trial court. This discretion is large when there is no objection. (2) We find the charge of misconduct on the part of the prosecution unsupported by the record. (3) The instructions given by the trial judge were without error. The judgment based on the jury conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Farias v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 13, 1970
423 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Farias v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Guadalupe ENRIQUETA FARIAS aka Lupe Farias, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1970

Citations

423 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

State v. Colby

The State offered evidence satisfactorily explaining the absence of the bast evidence, the videotape. See…