From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farace v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 12, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, Midey, Jr., J. — Negligence.

PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., GREEN, PINE, SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and the facts and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Claimant commenced this action as limited administrator of the estate of his brother (decedent), who died while an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility. Claimant offered expert proof that decedent died as a result of an asthma attack after correction officers refused to provide him with a refill of his asthma medication. Defendant offered expert proof that the death was caused by the combined effect of numerous drugs ingested by decedent. We reject defendant's contention that the determination of liability is against the weight of the evidence. "On a bench trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence" (Claridge Gardens v. Menotti, 160 A.D.2d 544, 544-545; see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495, rearg denied 81 N.Y.2d 835). The Court of Claims, after considering the conflicting evidence adduced at trial, concluded that the death of decedent was caused by asthma and that defendant's negligence in failing to comply with the request of decedent for asthma medication contributed to his death. A fair interpretation of the evidence, which included the report of the coroner and her testimony adhering to the conclusions contained in that report, supports the court's conclusion. In addition, the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to sustain the judgment (see, Executive Park W. I v. Koock Elan Jung, 224 A.D.2d 990, 991, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 803), supports the court's determination attributing no to decedent.

We find, however, that the award of damages for conscious pain and suffering of $300,000 is excessive, and we modify that award by reducing it to $100,000.


Summaries of

Farace v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Farace v. State

Case Details

Full title:PETER FARACE, LIMITED ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN FARACE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 376

Citing Cases

Lamendola v. N.Y. State Thruway Auth

Contrary to the further contention of claimants, we conclude that the Court of Claims properly determined…

Gardner v. Gardner

Nevertheless, the court concluded that, based on the continuing weather pattern, defendant did not have…