From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fant v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 1998
250 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.).


None of the Industrial Code provisions invoked by plaintiff, namely, 12 NYCRR 8-2.15 and 12 N.Y.CRR former 16.2 (e), former 16.5 (a) and former 16.8 (d), require that trap doors be equipped with a movable railing when open, and the out-of-possession landlord cannot otherwise be held liable for an accident arising out of the negligent use of a trap door where, as here, there is no showing of any structural defect, (see, Brown v. Weinreb, 183 A.D.2d 562).

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Nardelli, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Fant v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 1998
250 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Fant v. Mayer

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FANT, Appellant, v. NANCY B. MAYER, Respondent and Third-Party…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 5, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 684

Citing Cases

Baez v. Barnard College

Instead, plaintiff presented largely uncontroverted evidence that the basement hatch was dangerous because of…

Malloy v. Larstrand Corporation

In addition, they argued that none of the State Industrial Code provisions relied on by Plaintiff required…