From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fang Fang v. Radel

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 6, 2024
8:23-CV-02052-DOC-JDEx (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-CV-02052-DOC-JDEx

03-06-2024

FANG FANG v. DAVID M. RADEL


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED

On January 16, 2024, Defendant moved to dismissed Plaintiff's complaint. See Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 9) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, and the deadline to do so has passed.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss by March 18, 2024. Failure to oppose the motion may be deemed consent to the motion being granted as unopposed. If Plaintiff files an opposition, Defendant's reply is due March 25, 2024.

The motion hearing scheduled for March 11, 2024, is CONTINUED to April 1, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.

The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.


Summaries of

Fang Fang v. Radel

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 6, 2024
8:23-CV-02052-DOC-JDEx (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Fang Fang v. Radel

Case Details

Full title:FANG FANG v. DAVID M. RADEL

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 6, 2024

Citations

8:23-CV-02052-DOC-JDEx (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)