From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fallon v. Damianos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1993
192 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff was allegedly injured in a fall on a stairway in the defendant's building. On this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff contends that the court erred in submitting to the jury an interrogatory which limited the defendant's liability to the presence of duct tape on one of the steps. However, inasmuch as the evidence adduced at trial did not support any other theory of liability, the interrogatory was entirely proper. Indeed, it would have been erroneous to submit the interrogatory requested by the plaintiff since it included multiple theories of liability, at least one of which lacked supporting proof (see, Davis v Caldwell, 54 N.Y.2d 176; De Luca v Kameros, 130 A.D.2d 705; Cady v City of New York, 35 A.D.2d 202). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fallon v. Damianos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1993
192 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Fallon v. Damianos

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FALLON, Appellant, v. XENOPHON DAMIANOS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 134

Citing Cases

Vascellaro v. Brauner

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the third interrogatory submitted to the jury was proper. The…

Siegel v. Champion Parts, Inc.

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants. Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme…