From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 19, 2012
97 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–4302.

2012-09-19

James FAIRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William Roby, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432009CF001160A and 432009CF001162A. James Fairo, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William Roby, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432009CF001160A and 432009CF001162A.
James Fairo, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

MAY, C.J., HAZOURI and CONNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fairo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 19, 2012
97 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Fairo v. State

Case Details

Full title:James FAIRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Sep 19, 2012

Citations

97 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Coker v. State

The jury returned a general verdict, finding the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment, and, the…