Summary
explaining HUD was not in privity because "section 4a of the 2005 HAP [R]enewal [C]ontract stated that terms of the expiring HAP [C]ontract were renewed '[e]xcept as specifically modified by the Renewal Contract'" (fourth alteration in original)
Summary of this case from Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United StatesOpinion
No. 2007-1373.
August 25, 2008.
J. Michael Taylor, Joseph W. Dorn, Jeffrey M. Telep, King Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Peter J. Koenig, Daniel P. Wendt, Miller Chevalier, Chartered, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Michael J. Dierberg, Michael D. Panzera, Department of Justice, Natasha Robinson, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties' joint stipulation of dismissal, the appeal is hereby dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs.